Published on 02-26-2016 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE
As keepers of the constitution for the United States of America it is the duty of the Keepers to inform the people.
Presented by the Government of The United States of America!
First and foremost, the keepers of the constitution for the United States of America are not subject to the constitution for the United Sates of America. They receive many comments and questions and that particular question comes up in the conversation. The keepers have their own constitution and this keeper arrangement was by request of those that wanted the constitution for the United States of America to be safe and secure. The keepers look at the constitution for the United States of America as a contract to be upheld and also inform the general public of violations of that contract as determined by this Governments committees and other bodies within the Government of The United States of America. The request to record the 1789 constitution was honored and published and the service as keepers is being fulfilled.
Informing the people:
Statistics: According to the Current Population Survey, 1.1 million attorneys were working in the United States in 2012, but the Labor Department’s Employment projections program places the figure at 759,800. LINK
Many would believe that there were more in existence, however when broken down to the numbers, look under the section entitled “Number of Active & Resident Lawyers Per Capita” on the link above and that will give people some perspective.
In all legal relationships, the number one requirement in any document is to define the legal relationship so that all parties have a meeting of the minds.
A husband and a wife have a legal relationship. Basically the Husband married his ex-girlfriend and fiance when she became his wife and vice versa. Now the husband and wife relationship is defined and each party knows their place in the relationship. However, the entering of the public into the marriage does not have any legal relationship defined within the marriage. Any part of an agreement that is not clearly defined is considered null and void for vagueness because it is impossible for a judge to determine if or when the public was injured in a divorce because the legal relationship of the public in a marriage is not defined. The marriage parties read husband and wife, not husband, wife and public, therefore it is impossible for the public to claim a tort against the husband and wife in the case of a divorce.
In the constitution for the United States of America it reads:
“No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.”
The particular part in this example is “Citizen of the United States”. Today people are called U.S. citizens. Notice that there is no legal relationships defined between the U.S. citizen and the Citizen of the United States. When no definition of a legal relationship exists by and between two entities, one is not in anyway connected to the other.
The only way to connect the two entities would be to write: “and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States also known as a U.S. citizen,”. So which constitution is the U.S. citizen connected to or under? What legal relationship does the U.S. citizen have with the 1789 constitution? Where are the rights of the U.S. citizen to claim a document that does not recognize the U.S. citizen as existing in fact? Where is the bridge between a U.S. citizen and a Citizen of the United States?
Where is the bridge and legal relationship defined by and between many terms that are used to describe people in different situations and how do they all relate to each other?
What or where is the legal relationship defined by and between the words resident and place? What are the duties, rights, and responsibilities of the resident in a particular place? Is place defined? Where is the word resident in the constitution for the United States? Does the constitution for the United States of America recognize residents?
If any legal relationship is not defined, then it is not a part of something that is claimed to be associated with it. There are almost a million lawyers give or take a few. If there are in fact that many lawyers that are members of the American Bar Association, anyone would think that at least one would start defining or begin a practice in the field of “legal relationships” to dispel confusion among the people as a benefit to society therefore giving the American Bar Association the claim of a benefit to society.
Immigrants take an oath or affirmation to the constitution for the United States of America, yet are called U.S. citizens. That is called “bait and switch” especially if the constitution that the immigrant is taking an oath or affirmation too does not recognize a U.S. citizen. That condition also opens the country to many charges of Human Trafficking and therefore qualifies as a National Security Breach.
Does this report to the people need to go into anymore examples before they are convinced that there is a National Security Breach or that the American Bar Association is not doing what it was designed to do and that the members of said association are doing everything else other then what they are supposed to be doing?
The one and only purpose of a lawyer is to define legal relationships as a third party neutral under an advisory position for the purpose of resolution and settlement under peaceful settlement of disputes. The practice of representation of a party is outside of the scope of the term advisory and defining legal relationships which violates neutrality, therefore removes the immunity of neutrality.
Corruption is easily defined: When an elected representative changes the legal relationship of the people as it pertains to their government without the consent of the people through free and open elections.
Presented by the Government of The United States of America!