MORE INFORMATION ON THE CREATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL

.

EleanorRooseveltHumanRights.

HELLO EVERYONE,

WE HAVE BEEN RECEIVING SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DECISION CREATING THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL MAINLY ABOUT THE PROCESS ON HOW TO CLAIM A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION.

YES, IT IS TRUE, A DECLARATION IS NOT A TREATY, IT IS A COVENANT WHICH IS A CONTRACT, AND WE DID SEND AN INSTRUMENT OF RATIFICATION TO THE UN ACCEPTING THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACT CALLED: “THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION ON HUMAN RIGHTS”. ALTHOUGH IT IS CLAIMED BY THE ATTORNEY’S THAT DECLARATIONS ARE NOT LEGALLY BINDING OF WHICH IS NO SURPRISE TO SOCIETY MEMBERS, HERE IS WHAT IT DOES SAY AT THE BOTTOM OF THE DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS WEBSITE: http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/hr_law.shtml

QUOTE:

How Does International Law Protect Human Rights?
International human rights law lays down obligations which States are bound to respect. By becoming parties to international treaties, States assume obligations and duties under international law to respect, to protect and to fulfil human rights. The obligation to respect means that States must refrain from interfering with or curtailing the enjoyment of human rights. The obligation to protect requires States to protect individuals and groups against human rights abuses. The obligation to fulfil means that States must take positive action to facilitate the enjoyment of basic human rights.

Through ratification of international human rights treaties, Governments undertake to put into place domestic measures and legislation compatible with their treaty obligations and duties. The domestic legal system, therefore, provides the principal legal protection of human rights guaranteed under international law. Where domestic legal proceedings fail to address human rights abuses, mechanisms and procedures for individual and group complaints are available at the regional and international levels to help ensure that international human rights standards are indeed respected, implemented, and enforced at the local level.

END QUOTE

HERE IS THE ISSUE AS TO WHY THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL WAS CREATED!

.

[maxbutton id=”43″]

.

IF A DECLARATION IS NOT LEGALLY BINDING, THEN WHY WOULD THIS TRIBUNAL BE IN EXISTENCE WITH THE SPECIFIC WORDING:

“CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL” IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 8 OF THE DECLARATION ITSELF.  SOURCE:

http://www.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca/NS/index-eng.asp

IN THE CURRENT SYSTEM THAT EVERYONE IS FAMILIAR WITH IN EVERYDAY LIFE, THERE IS A:

1: SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AND A U.S. SUPREME COURT, THEN THE CONFUSION GETS WORSE FROM THERE. THERE ARE AT LEAST 4 DIFFERENT COURTS YOU HAVE TO FILE IN TO GET TO THE FEDERAL LEVEL FROM THE STATE LEVEL. IT COSTS AT LEAST 5000.00 TO FILE INTO THE SUPREME COURT. BY THE TIME ALL IS SAID AND DONE, IT WILL COST AT LEAST A HALF A MILLION DOLLARS TO EVEN GET TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS. THEN IF YOU TRY TO GO DIRECTLY TO THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSIONS ON HUMAN RIGHTS, THEY SAY YOU HAVE TO DEPLETE ALL REMEDIES AT THE COUNTRY LEVEL. THAT IS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION WITHIN ITSELF.

THE EASIEST WAY FOR THE ORIGINAL CONFEDERACY TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM IS GO TO THE CONTRACT LEVEL. THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL JUST CREATED YESTERDAY IS A CONTRACT/COVENANT COURT.

ALL INDIVIDUALS HAVE TO SIGN THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, GET IT NOTARIZED,  AND SEND AN ORIGINAL TO THE HEAD OF THE UNITED NATIONS WITH PROOF OF SERVICE. NOW WE HAVE A UNIVERSAL CONTRACT. ALL AFFIRMED American Nationals ARE ALREADY A PART OF THE CONTRACT AFTER TAKING THE OATH OR AFFIRMATION.

ADDRESS:

United Nations Secretariat

405 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017

THEN YOU CAN CLAIM: “HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER” STATUS, WHICH IS BASICALLY WHAT ALL “PATRIOTS” ARE ACTUALLY DOING EVERYDAY.  SURE BEATS “DOMESTIC TERRORIST”-“SOVEREIGN CITIZEN” AND “SOVEREIGN”.

SOURCE: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/SRHRDefenders/Pages/Defender.aspx

JUST IN CASE THAT LINK IS QUICKLY REMOVED, HERE IS A PDF COPY:

http://reignoftheheavens.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Who-is-a-defender.pdf

THE COMMITTEE NOR THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL HAVE THE ABILITY TO INTERFERE WITH LOCAL COURTS. HOWEVER, A PROCLAMATION CAN BE ISSUED PROCLAIMING AN EXISTENCE OF A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION AND ALSO A AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF. WE FIRST STARTED WITH AN ORDER BECAUSE THE ORIGINAL CONFEDERACY IS THE ORIGINAL GOVERNMENT AND HAS THE AUTHORITY TO ISSUE ORDERS ON A COUNTY AND STATE LEVEL. HOWEVER, WE ARE DEALING WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENTS UNDER OVERLAY SURVEYS WHICH IS UNITED NATIONS JURISDICTION.

QUOTE: BOTTOM OF THE SOURCE PAGE:

One way to get involved in litigation at the international level is by submitting an amicus curiae brief. Literally, the term means ‘friend of the court’. An amicus curiae brief is filed with the court by someone who is not a party to the case.

END QUOTE:

SOURCE: http://www.humanrights.is/the-human-rights-project/humanrightscasesandmaterials/complaintsprocedures/

EVEN THOUGH THE ORIGINAL CONFEDERACY DOES HAVE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ON THE COUNTY LEVEL, WE ARE TRYING TO BE  MORE DIPLOMATIC ABOUT THIS WHOLE ISSUE WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNDER UN JURISDICTION. 

DON’T WORRY, DON’T PANIC, THE ORIGINAL CONFEDERACY OF 1781 DOES HAVE THE LEGAL AND LAWFUL RIGHT TO DO WHAT IT IS DOING IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS ARENA AND THE CREATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL.  

THE PROCESS TO FILE A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION CLAIM IS AS FOLLOWS AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE IF FOUND TO BE FAULTY: THIS IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY AND SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ASSEMBLY ON MONDAY, THE 5TH OF MAY, 2014.

MMIN-04292014-CMTE

IF THERE ARE ANY UPDATES, WE WILL CERTAINLY LET EVERYONE KNOW. WE ARE ALL HOPING THAT WE RECEIVE COOPERATION IN THIS ENDEAVOR FROM THE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL WHEREAS WE HAVE FOUND THAT THE FEDERAL CLERKS HAVE NEVER EVEN HEARD OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS OR A COMPETENT NATIONAL TRIBUNAL WHICH IS REALLY SAD.